I was listening to The Mike Malloy Show last night (XM Radio channel 167) on my way home from work. While I don’t support a lot of what the man says, I was very interested by a guest he had on the show. It seems Vincent Bugliosi, an American lawyer and writer.
Bugliosi was introducing a book he recently wrote titled The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder (2008, Perseus Books) which details the lawyers grounds for legally charging Bush for murder. He presents several interesting facts I hadn’t heard before. First, Bugliosi says that before unveiling the idea of war to the American public, Bush considered pressuring Saddam Hussein into attacking the US. This really strikes me as insane. If true, this means that Bush wanted Iraq to attack the States militarily, and as there is no way Saddam could have sent troops in any reasonable number, it tells us he wanted Iraq to be creative. That, to me, is alarming.
In another revelation, Bugliosi claims that Bush altered a document known as the “White Paper” to make Saddam seem more dangerous to America than he really was. The original draft of this statement, issued as a National Intelligence Estimate , stated that while Iraq may have had WMD’s, Saddam wouldn’t use them except in self defense. Less than a week after that document was released (and the altered by Bush), the President gave a speech which said that Iraq was willing to attack America with a stockpile of WMD’s at any time.
Now I’m not a fan of extremists, and thus I’m not a fan of Bugliosi trying Bush for the murder of 4,000 US troops or the roughly 100,000 Iraqi civilians killed in our Middle Eastern misadventure. However, if Clinton was impeached for sleeping around, I think Bush could be ushered out of office over this.
I hope to get a copy of this book soon, and I strongly encourage you to look into these allegations yourself.
June 14, 2008
Brought Into Better Light
Posted by kensnews under Site News | Tags: Comment Responses, From Ken, Global Warming, Site Stuff |[2] Comments
I recently received a comment on a post of mine which entertained the notion that the flooding in Iowa is directly related to global warming. Here is a link to said comment within my own blog. I invite you to read that comment before continuing reading this post.
Thank you, atomcat, for your opinions. Now, let me address some issues I have with this comment. First, whoever truly believes that global warming has been invented by elitists whos aims include:
“1) A New world order.
2) Massive depopulation.”
is scarcely qualified to place an order at McDonald’s, let alone try and alter the minds of the world. Our entire existence is at stake. All that we currently know could drastically change in our future if we don’t change what we are doing to the environment.
While I am very glad atomcat visited this blog and brought such ignorance into focus, I hope that those who read this blog will also take the time to visit atomcat’s blog HERE. If you are ever in need of pure, spoon-fed propaganda spit out to corrupt our well-meaning world, give it a look.
I would like everyone to know I will always, always include your comments, unedited, on this blog. Unlike atomcat, every voice is valued here, positive and negative, and while I will argue with you if I disagree, you better believe you will be published gladly.
Lastly, I want to ask everyone out there who understands how crucial the issue of global warming is to speak out to naysayers. While we cannot accurately gauge exactly how dire our situation is, we can be confident our time is limited. Support this cause. At the least, you will be making our nation and world stronger.